Cagol, Alessandro;
Cortese, Rosa;
Barakovic, Muhamed;
Schaedelin, Sabine;
Ruberte, Esther;
Absinta, Martina;
Barkhof, Frederik;
... MAGNIMS Study Group; + view all
(2023)
Diagnostic Performance of Cortical Lesions and the Central Vein Sign in Multiple Sclerosis.
JAMA Neurology
10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.4737.
(In press).
Preview |
PDF
jamaneurology_cagol_2023_oi_230089_1701788700.04526.pdf - Published Version Download (793kB) | Preview |
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) misdiagnosis remains an important issue in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the performance of cortical lesions (CLs) and central vein sign (CVS) in distinguishing MS from other conditions showing brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional multicenter study, with clinical and MRI data acquired between January 2010 and May 2020. Centralized MRI analysis was conducted between July 2020 and December 2022 by 2 raters blinded to participants' diagnosis. Participants were recruited from 14 European centers and from a multicenter pan-European cohort. Eligible participants had a diagnosis of MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), or non-MS conditions; availability of a brain 3-T MRI scan with at least 1 sequence suitable for CL and CVS assessment; presence of T2-hyperintense white matter lesions (WMLs). A total of 1051 individuals were included with either MS/CIS (n = 599; 386 [64.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 41.5 [12.3] years) or non-MS conditions (including other neuroinflammatory disorders, cerebrovascular disease, migraine, and incidental WMLs in healthy control individuals; n = 452; 302 [66.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 49.2 [14.5] years). Five individuals were excluded due to missing clinical or demographic information (n = 3) or unclear diagnosis (n = 2). EXPOSURES: MS/CIS vs non-MS conditions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to explore the diagnostic performance of CLs and the CVS in isolation and in combination; sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for various cutoffs. The diagnostic importance of CLs and CVS compared to conventional MRI features (ie, presence of infratentorial, periventricular, and juxtacortical WMLs) was ranked with a random forest model. RESULTS: The presence of CLs and the previously proposed 40% CVS rule had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for MS of 59.0% (95% CI, 55.1-62.8), 93.6% (95% CI, 91.4-95.6), and 73.9% (95% CI, 71.6-76.3) and 78.7% (95% CI, 75.5-82.0), 86.0% (95% CI, 82.1-89.5), and 81.5% (95% CI, 78.9-83.7), respectively. The diagnostic performance of the CVS (AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.91]) was superior to that of CLs (AUC, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.80]; P < .001), and was increased when combining the 2 imaging markers (AUC, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90-0.94]; P = .04); in the random forest model, both CVS and CLs outperformed the presence of infratentorial, periventricular, and juxtacortical WMLs in supporting MS differential diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings in this study suggest that CVS and CLs may be valuable tools to increase the accuracy of MS diagnosis.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
