UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an analysis of alternative scenarios using a decision model

Simpson, N; Anderson, R; Sassi, F; Pitman, A; Lewis, P; Tu, K; Lannin, H; (2005) The cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an analysis of alternative scenarios using a decision model. Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation , 3 , Article 8. 10.1186/1478-7547-3-8. Green open access

[thumbnail of The cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis an analysis of alternative scenarios using a decision model.pdf]
Preview
Text
The cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis an analysis of alternative scenarios using a decision model.pdf - Other

Download (357kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis is widely debated in the United Kingdom and elsewhere, but the evidence available to inform policy is limited. This paper explores the cost-effectiveness of adding screening for cystic fibrosis to an existing routine neonatal screening programme for congenital hypothyroidism and phenylketonuria, under alternative scenarios and assumptions. METHODS: The study is based on a decision model comparing screening to no screening in terms of a number of outcome measures, including diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, life-time treatment costs, life years and QALYs gained. The setting is a hypothetical UK health region without an existing neonatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis. RESULTS: Under initial assumptions, neonatal screening (using an immunoreactive trypsin/DNA two stage screening protocol) costs £5,387 per infant diagnosed, or £1.83 per infant screened (1998 costs). Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis produces an incremental cost-effectiveness of £6,864 per QALY gained, in our base case scenario (an assumed benefit of a 6 month delay in the emergence of symptoms). A difference of 11 months or more in the emergence of symptoms (and mean survival) means neonatal screening is both less costly and produces better outcomes than no screening. CONCLUSION: Neonatal screening is expensive as a method of diagnosis. Neonatal screening may be a cost-effective intervention if the hypothesised delays in the onset of symptoms are confirmed. Implementing both antenatal and neonatal screening would undermine potential economic benefits, since a reduction in the birth incidence of cystic fibrosis would reduce the cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening.

Type: Article
Title: The cost-effectiveness of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an analysis of alternative scenarios using a decision model
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-3-8
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-3-8
Language: English
Additional information: © 2005 Simpson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Decision model; economic evaluation; screening; cystic fibrosis
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry > Epidemiology and Applied Clinical Research
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10182138
Downloads since deposit
5Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item