UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Management of late-onset fetal growth restriction: pragmatic approach

Peasley, R; Rangel, LAA; Casagrandi, D; Donadono, V; Willinger, M; Conti, G; Seminara, Y; ... Napolitano, R; + view all (2023) Management of late-onset fetal growth restriction: pragmatic approach. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) , 62 (1) pp. 106-114. 10.1002/uog.26190. Green open access

[thumbnail of David_Ultrasound in Obstet   Gyne - 2023 - Peasley.pdf]
Preview
Text
David_Ultrasound in Obstet Gyne - 2023 - Peasley.pdf

Download (423kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: International guidelines recommend delivery from 37 weeks in small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses mostly because of stillbirth concerns. Differentiating SGA from late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) is challenged by the limited prospective evidence to guide management. We prospectively assessed a novel protocol that used ultrasound criteria to classify women with suspected late FGR into two groups: low-risk with expectant management until the expected date of delivery and high-risk with delivery soon after 37 weeks. Furthermore, we compared the outcome of this prospective cohort with a historical cohort of women similarly presenting with suspected late FGR, to evaluate the impact of implementation of the new protocol. METHODS: This was a prospective study in women with a singleton non-anomalous fetus at ≥32 weeks with any of the following inclusion criteria: estimated fetal weight (EFW) ≤10th centile, ≥50 centiles decrease of the abdominal circumference (AC) from previous scans, umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index >95th centile or cerebroplacental ratio <5th centile. Women were stratified into low- or high-risk late FGR. Women in the low-risk group were delivered by 41 weeks unless meeting high-risk criteria for delivery later on, whereas women in the high-risk group (PAPP-A <0.4MoM, EFW <3rd centile, or EFW ≥3rd and ≤10th centile with AC drop or abnormal Dopplers) were delivered at 37 weeks. The primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome including hypothermia, hypoglycemia, neonatal unit admission, jaundice requiring treatment, suspected infection, feeding difficulties, Apgar score <7 at 1 minute, hospital readmission and any of the severe adverse neonatal outcome (perinatal death, resuscitation using inotropes or mechanical ventilation, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, metabolic acidosis, sepsis, cerebral, cardiac or respiratory morbidity). Secondary outcomes were adverse maternal outcome (operative delivery for abnormal fetal heart rate) and severe adverse neonatal outcome. Women managed according with the new protocol were compared with a historical cohort where management was guided by individual clinician's expertise. RESULTS: Over 18 months (2018-2019), 321 women were included. Adverse neonatal outcome was significantly less common in low- (n=156) compared with high-risk fetus (n=165): 45 vs 57%; aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P=0.022. There was no significant difference in adverse maternal outcome (18% vs 24%; aOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.4-1.2; P=0.142) and severe adverse neonatal outcome (3.8% vs 8.5%; aOR: 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2-1.3; P=0.153) between low and high-risk group. Compared to women delivered prior to the implementation of the new protocol and classified retrospectively into low- and high-risk late FGR (n=323), there was a lower adverse neonatal outcome (45% vs 58%; aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P=0.026) in the low-risk late FGR clinic group. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate risk classification to define management in low- and high-risk FGR groups was associated with reduced adverse neonatal outcome in the low-risk group. In clinical practice a policy of expectantly managing women with late-onset low-risk FGR pregnancies at term could improve neonatal and long-term development. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the effect of an evidence based conservative management protocol of late FGR on perinatal morbidity, mortality and long-term neurodevelopment.

Type: Article
Title: Management of late-onset fetal growth restriction: pragmatic approach
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/uog.26190
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26190
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Late fetal growth restriction, risk classification, timing of delivery, ultrasound management
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health > Maternal and Fetal Medicine
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health > Neonatology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10166921
Downloads since deposit
52Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item