Blumenau, Jack; Hicks, Timothy; Pahontu, Raluca L; (2022) Risk and Preferences for Government Healthcare Spending: Evidence from the UK COVID-19 Crisis. British Journal of Political Science 10.1017/s0007123422000539. (In press).

Preview

Text risk-and-preferences-for-government-healthcare-spending-evidence-from-the-uk-covid-19-crisis.pdf - Published Version Download (315kB) | Preview

Abstract

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic constituted a large shock to the risk of acquiring a disease that represents a meaningful threat to health. We investigate whether individuals subject to larger increases in objective health risk – operationalized by occupation-based measures of proximity to other people – became more supportive of increased government healthcare spending during the crisis. Using panel data that track UK individuals before (May 2018–December 2019) and after (June 2020) the outbreak of the pandemic, we implement a fixed-effect design that was pre-registered before the key treatment variable was available to us. While individuals in high-risk occupations were more worried about their personal risk of infection and had higher COVID-19 death rates, there is no evidence that increased health risks during COVID-19 shifted either attitudes on government spending on healthcare or broader attitudes relating to redistribution. Our findings are consistent with recent research demonstrating the limited effects of the pandemic on political attitudes.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item