Dsouza, Mark;
(2021)
Part 1: Could the ‘wrongness hypothesis’ be wrong?
[Digital scholarly resource].
https://criminaljusticetheoryblog.wordpress.com/20...
Preview |
Text
Dsouza_Post 1- Could the wrongness hypothesis be wrong.pdf Download (206kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this post, I suggest that there is reason to doubt one of the foundational propositions that is often used to structure our understanding and classification of criminal law defences – what I call the ‘wrongness hypothesis’. The wrongness hypothesis is used in most theories of criminal defences to separate out the set of rationale-based defences into justifications and rationale-based excuses.
Type: | Digital scholarly resource |
---|---|
Title: | Part 1: Could the ‘wrongness hypothesis’ be wrong? |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | https://criminaljusticetheoryblog.wordpress.com/20... |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Rationale-based Defences, Criminal Law, Justifications, Excuses |
UCL classification: | UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10157702 |
Downloads since deposit
25Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Archive Staff Only
View Item |