UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Xenogeneic Dermal Matrix Versus Autologous Connective Tissue Graft Versus No Graft at Abutment Connection for Improving Aesthetics: 6 Month Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial

Baldi, N; Buti, J; Mensi, M; Alfonsi, F; Cinquini, C; Tonelli, P; Barone, A; (2020) Xenogeneic Dermal Matrix Versus Autologous Connective Tissue Graft Versus No Graft at Abutment Connection for Improving Aesthetics: 6 Month Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial. Clinical Trials in Dentistry , 2 (2) pp. 49-62. 10.36130/ctd.03.2020.05. Green open access

[thumbnail of Baldi_2020;02(2)49-62.pdf]
Preview
Text
Baldi_2020;02(2)49-62.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (590kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a xenogeneic dermal matrix in widening keratinised peri-implant tissues du-ring second-stage surgery, and to compare it to both autologous connective tissue graft and a control group with no augmentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Patients requiring an increase in keratinised gingiva width were enrolled by four university/dental practices and randomised into three different groups for grafting procedures at the implant uncovering stage: either xenogeneic dermal matrix (Group X), autologous connective tissue graft (Group A) or no graft (control, Group C). The primary outcomes were width of keratinised tissue and facial soft tissue levels, evaluated at three different time points (T0, implant uncovering stage; T1 and T2, six weeks and six months after surgery, respectively). Secondary outcomes were: implant failure, complications, marginal bone loss, papilla index, facial soft tissue level, pink esthetic score, and aesthetic assessment by patients. RESULTS. Thirty-six patients, with one implant per patient, were enrolled at two centres (18 at each centre): 12 for control, 12 for xenogeneic dermal matrix and 12 for autologous tissue graft. Three patients dropped out and two patients from the autologous group had implant failures. No complications were recorded. After six months, the width of keratini-sed tissue increased by 0.16 ± 1.01 (P = 0.79), 1.05 ± 0.76 (P = 0.01) and 0.80 ± 1.73 mm (P = 0.28), and facial soft tissue level was-0.95 ± 0.85 (P = 0.04), 0.32 ± 0.57 (P = 0.15) and 0.35 ± 0.79 mm (P = 0.30) respectively in Groups C, X and A groups. Between-group analysis showed that, with respect to control, only facial soft tissue level (1.31 mm, P = 0.01) and width of keratinised mucosa (2.43 mm, P = 0.01) outcomes in the autologous graft group were statistically significant at T2. Mean marginal bone loss between T0-T2 was-0.4 ± 0.4mm, with no differences between groups. Pink aesthetic score showed no significant differences between groups, being 0.89 for A-C (P = 0.41), 0.88 for A–X (P = 0.63) and 0.72 for X-C (P = 0.88). Patient’s aesthetic satisfaction (Visual Analogue Scale) was 92.2 ± 8.4, 93.8 ± 7.7, 97.2 ± 3.0, for Groups C, X and A, respectively. Between the two dental centres, only facial soft tissue level at T0–T2 was significantly different, by 0.67 ± 0.62 mm (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS. After six months, autologous connective tissue graft yielded a significant gain in facial soft tissue levels and width of keratinised mucosa, as compared to the control group (no graft).

Type: Article
Title: Xenogeneic Dermal Matrix Versus Autologous Connective Tissue Graft Versus No Graft at Abutment Connection for Improving Aesthetics: 6 Month Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.36130/ctd.03.2020.05
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.36130/CTD.03.2020.05
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: peri-implant soft tissues, connective tissue graft, xenogeneic dermal matrix, dental implants, second-stage surgery
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute > Restorative Dental Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10157507
Downloads since deposit
45Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item