Day, BL;
Ocal, D;
Peters, A;
Bancroft, MJ;
Cash, D;
Kaski, D;
Crutch, SJ;
(2021)
Altered visual and haptic verticality perception in posterior cortical atrophy and Alzheimer's disease.
The Journal of Physiology
10.1113/JP282289.
(In press).
Preview |
Text
Bancroft_Altered visual and haptic verticality perception in posterior cortical atrophy and Alzheimers disease.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
There is increasing theoretical and empirical support for the brain combining multisensory information to determine the direction of gravity and hence uprightness. A fundamental part of the process is the spatial transformation of sensory signals between reference frames: eye-centred, head-centred, body-centred, etc. The question ‘Am I the right way up?’ posed by a patient with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) suggests disturbances in upright perception, subsequently investigated in PCA and typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD) based on what looks or feels upright. Participants repeatedly aligned to vertical a rod presented either visually (visual-vertical) or haptically (haptic-vertical). Visual-vertical involved orienting a projected rod presented without or with a visual orientation cue (circle, tilted square (±18°)). Haptic-vertical involved orientating a grasped rod with eyes closed using a combination of side (left, right) and hand (unimanual, bimanual) configurations. Intraindividual uncertainty and bias defined verticality perception. Uncertainty was consistently greater in both patient groups than in control groups, and greater in PCA than tAD. Bias in the frontal plane was strongly directionally affected by visual cue tilt (visual-vertical) and grip side (haptic-vertical). A model was developed that assumed verticality information from multiple sources is combined in a statistically optimal way to produce observed uncertainties and biases. Model results suggest the mechanism that spatially transforms graviceptive information between body parts is disturbed in both patient groups. Despite visual dysfunction being typically considered the primary feature of PCA, disturbances were greater in PCA than tAD particularly for haptic-vertical, and are considered in light of posterior parietal vulnerability.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
