Koivu, AM;
Hunter, PJ;
Näsänen-Gilmore, P;
Muthiani, Y;
Isojärvi, J;
Pörtfors, P;
Ashorn, U;
(2021)
Modular literature review: a novel systematic search and review method to support priority setting in health policy and practice.
BMC Medical Research Methodology
, 21
, Article 268. 10.1186/s12874-021-01463-y.
Preview |
Text
Hunter_s12874-021-01463-y.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: There is an unmet need for review methods to support priority-setting, policy-making and strategic planning when a wide variety of interventions from differing disciplines may have the potential to impact a health outcome of interest. This article describes a Modular Literature Review, a novel systematic search and review method that employs systematic search strategies together with a hierarchy-based appraisal and synthesis of the resulting evidence. // Methods: We designed the Modular Review to examine the effects of 43 interventions on a health problem of global significance. Using the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design) framework, we developed a single four-module search template in which population, comparison and outcome modules were the same for each search and the intervention module was different for each of the 43 interventions. A series of literature searches were performed in five databases, followed by screening, extraction and analysis of data. “ES documents”, source documents for effect size (ES) estimates, were systematically identified based on a hierarchy of evidence. The evidence was categorised according to the likely effect on the outcome and presented in a standardised format with quantitative effect estimates, meta-analyses and narrative reporting. We compared the Modular Review to other review methods in health research for its strengths and limitations. // Results: The Modular Review method was used to review the impact of 46 antenatal interventions on four specified birth outcomes within 12 months. A total of 61,279 records were found; 35,244 were screened by title-abstract. Six thousand two hundred seventy-two full articles were reviewed against the inclusion criteria resulting in 365 eligible articles. // Conclusions: The Modular Review preserves principles that have traditionally been important to systematic reviews but can address multiple research questions simultaneously. The result is an accessible, reliable answer to the question of “what works?”. Thus, it is a well-suited literature review method to support prioritisation, decisions and planning to implement an agenda for health improvement.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Modular literature review: a novel systematic search and review method to support priority setting in health policy and practice |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12874-021-01463-y |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01463-y |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
Keywords: | Modular review; Systematic review; Review methodology; Priority-setting; Health policy; Evidence-based policy; Randomised controlled trial; Effect size |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Dept |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10139287 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |