UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Investigating the effect of flow compensation and quantitative susceptibility mapping method on the accuracy of venous susceptibility measurement

Berg, RC; Preibisch, C; Thomas, DL; Shmueli, K; Biondetti, E; (2021) Investigating the effect of flow compensation and quantitative susceptibility mapping method on the accuracy of venous susceptibility measurement. NeuroImage , 240 , Article 118399. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118399. Green open access

[thumbnail of Shmueli_Investigating the effect of flow compensation and quantitative susceptibility mapping method on the accuracy of venous susceptibility measurement_VoR.pdf]
Preview
Text
Shmueli_Investigating the effect of flow compensation and quantitative susceptibility mapping method on the accuracy of venous susceptibility measurement_VoR.pdf - Published Version

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a promising non-invasive method for obtaining information relating to oxygen metabolism. However, the optimal acquisition sequence and QSM reconstruction method for reliable venous susceptibility measurements are unknown. Full flow compensation is generally recommended to correct for the influence of venous blood flow, although the effect of flow compensation on the accuracy of venous susceptibility values has not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we investigated the effect of different acquisition sequences, including different flow compensation schemes, and different QSM reconstruction methods on venous susceptibilities. Ten healthy subjects were scanned with five or six distinct QSM sequence designs using monopolar readout gradients and different flow compensation schemes. All data sets were processed using six different QSM pipelines and venous blood susceptibility was evaluated in whole-brain segmentations of the venous vasculature and single veins. The quality of vein segmentations and the accuracy of venous susceptibility values were analyzed and compared between all combinations of sequences and reconstruction methods. The influence of the QSM reconstruction method on average venous susceptibility values was found to be 2.7–11.6 times greater than the influence of the acquisition sequence, including flow compensation. The majority of the investigated QSM reconstruction methods tended to underestimate venous susceptibility values in the vein segmentations that were obtained. In summary, we found that multi-echo gradient-echo acquisition sequences without full flow compensation yielded venous susceptibility values comparable to sequences with full flow compensation. However, the QSM reconstruction method had a great influence on susceptibility values and thus needs to be selected carefully for accurate venous QSM.

Type: Article
Title: Investigating the effect of flow compensation and quantitative susceptibility mapping method on the accuracy of venous susceptibility measurement
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118399
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118399
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Flow compensation, Image processing, Quantitative susceptibility mapping, Sequence design, Vein segmentation, Venous oxygenation
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Brain Repair and Rehabilitation
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Med Phys and Biomedical Eng
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10132453
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item