Dall'Ava, L;
Hothi, H;
Henckel, J;
Di Laura, A;
Tirabosco, R;
Eskelinen, A;
Skinner, J;
(2021)
Osseointegration of retrieved 3D-printed, off-the-shelf acetabular implants.
Bone & Joint Research
, 10
(7)
pp. 388-400.
10.1302/2046-3758.107.BJR-2020-0462.R1.
Preview |
Text
2046-3758.107.bjr-2020-0462.r1.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
AIMS: The main advantage of 3D-printed, off-the-shelf acetabular implants is the potential to promote enhanced bony fixation due to their controllable porous structure. In this study we investigated the extent of osseointegration in retrieved 3D-printed acetabular implants. METHODS: We compared two groups, one made via 3D-printing (n = 7) and the other using conventional techniques (n = 7). We collected implant details, type of surgery and removal technique, patient demographics, and clinical history. Bone integration was assessed by macroscopic visual analysis, followed by sectioning to allow undecalcified histology on eight sections (~200 µm) for each implant. The outcome measures considered were area of bone attachment (%), extent of bone ingrowth (%), bone-implant contact (%), and depth of ingrowth (%), and these were quantified using a line-intercept method. RESULTS: The two groups were matched for patient sex, age (61 and 63 years), time to revision (30 and 41 months), implant size (54 mm and 52 mm), and porosity (72% and 60%) (p > 0.152). There was no difference in visual bony attachment (p = 0.209). Histological analysis showed greater bone ingrowth in 3D-printed implants (p < 0.001), with mean bone attachment of 63% (SD 28%) and 37% (SD 20%), respectively. This was observed for all the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to investigate osseointegration in retrieved 3D-printed acetabular implants. Greater bone ingrowth was found in 3D-printed implants, suggesting that better osseointegration can be achieved. However, the influence of specific surgeon, implant, and patient factors needs to be considered. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):388-400.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
