Perski, O;
(2021)
Scientific and ethical challenges to defining what constitutes 'proportionate evidence' for the regulation and accreditation of applications to treat addiction.
Addiction
, 116
(12)
pp. 3285-3287.
10.1111/add.15619.
Preview |
Text
Perski_add.15619_extracted.pdf - Published Version Download (105kB) | Preview |
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Scientific and ethical challenges to defining what constitutes 'proportionate evidence' for the regulation and accreditation of applications to treat addiction |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1111/add.15619 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15619 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Keywords: | Addiction research, app accreditation, app regulation, apps, digital health, mHealth |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10129903 |
Downloads since deposit
73Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
