UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Patient, clinician and independent observer perspectives of shared decision making in adult orthodontics.

Keshtgar, A; Cunningham, SJ; Jones, E; Ryan, FS; (2021) Patient, clinician and independent observer perspectives of shared decision making in adult orthodontics. Journal of Orthodontics 10.1177/14653125211007504. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Perspective of shared decision making in adult orthodontics (accepted version).pdf]
Preview
Text
Perspective of shared decision making in adult orthodontics (accepted version).pdf - Accepted Version

Download (485kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the extent of shared decision making (SDM) in orthodontics from the perspective of patients, clinicians and independent observers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, observational study. SETTING: NHS teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 31 adult patients and their treating clinicians were included in the study. METHODS: The extent of SDM in new patient orthodontic consultations was measured using three versions of a validated instrument: the self-administered patient dyadic-OPTION scale; the self-administered clinician dyadic-OPTION scale; and an independent observer-rated OPTION12 scale. Patients and clinicians completed the 12-item dyadic-OPTION questionnaire independently at the end of the consultation to rate their perceived levels of SDM. The consultations were also audio-recorded and two calibrated raters independently rated the extent of SDM in these consultations using the OPTION12 scale. RESULTS: There was excellent inter-rater reliability between the two independent raters using the OPTION12 scale (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.909). The mean patient, clinician and independent observer OPTION scores for SDM were 90.4% (SD 9.1%, range 70.8% to 100%), 76.2% (SD 8.95%, range 62.5% to 95.8%) and 42.6% (SD 17.4%, range 13.5% to 68.8%), respectively. There was no significant correlation between the OPTION scores for the three groups (ICC = -0.323). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that generally high levels of SDM were perceived by patients and clinicians but lower levels of SDM were scored by the independent observers. However, it could be argued that the patient's perception of SDM is the most important measure as it is their care that is affected by their involvement.

Type: Article
Title: Patient, clinician and independent observer perspectives of shared decision making in adult orthodontics.
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/14653125211007504
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125211007504
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: OPTION scale, OPTION12, SDM, Shared decision making, dyadic-OPTION, patient-centred care
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute > EDI Craniofacial and Development Sci
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences > Dept of Statistical Science
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10129545
Downloads since deposit
201Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item