UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Comparison of figure-of-8 and circular coils for threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation measurements

Ørskov, S; Bostock, H; Howells, J; Pugdahl, K; Fuglsang-Frederiksen, A; Nielsen, CS-Z; Cengiz, B; ... Tankisi, H; + view all (2021) Comparison of figure-of-8 and circular coils for threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation measurements. Neurophysiologie Clinique , 51 (2) pp. 153-160. 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.01.001. Green open access

[thumbnail of Bostock_Orskov Figure of 8 Accepted.pdf]
Preview
Text
Bostock_Orskov Figure of 8 Accepted.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (524kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique of threshold-tracking short-interval intracortical inhibition (T-SICI) has been proposed as a diagnostic tool for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Most of these studies have used a circular coil, whereas a figure-of-8 coil is usually recommended for paired-pulse TMS measurements. The aim of this study was to compare figure-of-8 and circular coils for T-SICI in the upper limb, with special attention to reproducibility, and the pain or discomfort experienced by the subjects. METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects (aged: 45.5 ± 6.7, mean ± SD, 9 females, 11 males) underwent two examinations with each coil, in morning and afternoon sessions on the same day, with T-SICI measured at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from 1-7 ms. After each examination the subjects rated degree of pain/discomfort from 0 to 10 using a numerical rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: Mean T-SICI was higher for the figure-of-8 than for the circular coil at ISI of 2 ms (p < 0.05) but did not differ at other ISIs. Intra-subject variability did not differ between coils, but mean inhibition from 1-3.5 ms was less variable between subjects with the figure-of-8 coil (SD 7.2% vs. 11.2% RMT, p < 0.05), and no such recordings were without inhibition (vs. 6 with the circular coil). The subjects experienced less pain/discomfort with the figure-of-8 coil (mean NRS: 1.9 ± 1.28 vs 2.8 ± 1.60, p < 0.005). DISCUSSION: The figure-of-8 coil may have better applicability in patients, due to the lower incidence of lack of inhibition in healthy subjects, and the lower experience of pain or discomfort.

Type: Article
Title: Comparison of figure-of-8 and circular coils for threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation measurements
Location: France
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.01.001
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2021.01.001
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Circular coil, Figure-of-8 coil, SICI, Short interval intracortical inhibition, TMS, Threshold tracking, Transcranial magnetic stimulation
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Clinical and Movement Neurosciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10120119
Downloads since deposit
167Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item