UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Repeated intermittent ulipristal acetate in the treatment of uterine fibroids: A costeffectiveness analysis

Geale, K; Saridogan, E; Lehmann, M; Arriagada, P; Hultberg, M; Henriksson, M; (2017) Repeated intermittent ulipristal acetate in the treatment of uterine fibroids: A costeffectiveness analysis. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research , 9 pp. 669-676. 10.2147/CEOR.S143557. Green open access

[thumbnail of CEOR-143557-repeated-intermittent-ulipristal-acetate-in-the-treatment-of_110117.pdf]
Preview
Text
CEOR-143557-repeated-intermittent-ulipristal-acetate-in-the-treatment-of_110117.pdf - Published Version

Download (850kB) | Preview

Abstract

There are limited treatment options available for women with moderate to severe symptoms of uterine fibroids (UFs) who wish to avoid surgery. For these women, treatment with standard pharmaceuticals such as contraceptives is often insufficient to relieve symptoms, and patients may require surgery despite their wish to avoid it. Clinical trials demonstrate that ulipristal acetate 5 mg (UPA) is an effective treatment for this patient group, but its cost-effectiveness has not been assessed in this population. A decision-analytic model was developed to simulate a cohort of patients in this population under treatment with UPA followed by surgery as needed compared to treatment with iron and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) followed by surgery as needed (best supportive care, BSC). The analysis took the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) in England, UK, and was based on the published UPA clinical trials. Results were calculated for the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each treatment arm and combined into an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the primary outcome. The impact of parameter uncertainty on the results was assessed using scenario, deterministic, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The results show that treating patients with the UPA strategy, instead of the BSC strategy, results in an additional cost of £1,115 and a gain of 0.087 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of £12,850. Given commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds in England, the use of UPA as a repeated, intermittent treatment for women with moderate to severe symptoms of UF wishing to avoid surgery is likely to be a cost-effective intervention when compared to BSC.

Type: Article
Title: Repeated intermittent ulipristal acetate in the treatment of uterine fibroids: A costeffectiveness analysis
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S143557
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S143557
Language: English
Additional information: © 2020. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
Keywords: uterine fibroids, cost-effectiveness, health economics, ulipristal acetate, economic evaluation
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health > Reproductive Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10110360
Downloads since deposit
48Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item