UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Response to: Comment on 'How do paper and electronic records compare for completeness? A three centre study'

Wu, CHK; Luk, SMH; Holder, RL; Rodrigues, Z; Ahmed, F; Murdoch, I; (2019) Response to: Comment on 'How do paper and electronic records compare for completeness? A three centre study'. Eye , 33 (10) pp. 1666-1667. 10.1038/s41433-019-0467-2. Green open access

[thumbnail of Murdoch_EYE  33 (10) pp. 1666-1667 EPR reply letter SLIM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Murdoch_EYE 33 (10) pp. 1666-1667 EPR reply letter SLIM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (105kB) | Preview
Type: Article
Title: Response to: Comment on 'How do paper and electronic records compare for completeness? A three centre study'
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0467-2
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0467-2
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10102051
Downloads since deposit
32Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item