UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: a clinical comparison of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and probabilistic finite element modelling

Knoops, PGM; Borghi, A; Breakey, R; Ong, J; Jeelani, O; Bruun, R; Schievano, S; ... Padwa, B; + view all (2019) Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: a clinical comparison of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and probabilistic finite element modelling. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.008. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of 2018 Knoops et al Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery.pdf]
Preview
Text
2018 Knoops et al Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Three-dimensional surgical planning is used widely in orthognathic surgery. Although numerous computer programs exist, the accuracy of soft tissue prediction remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the prediction accuracy of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and a probabilistic finite element method (PFEM). Seven patients (mean age 18 years; five female) who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with preoperative and 1-year postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were included. The three programs were used for soft tissue prediction using planned and postoperative maxillary position, and these were compared to postoperative CBCT. Accurate predictions were obtained with each program, indicated by root mean square distances: RMSDolphin = 1.8 0.8 mm, RMSProPlan = 1.2 0.4 mm, and RMSPFEM = 1.3 0.4 mm. Dolphin utilizes a landmark-based algorithm allowing for patient-specific bone-to-soft tissue ratios, which works well for cephalometric radiographs but has limited three-dimensional accuracy, whilst ProPlan and PFEM provide better three-dimensional predictions with continuous displacements. Patient or population-specific material properties can be defined in PFEM, while no soft tissue parameters are adjustable in ProPlan. Important clinical considerations are the topological differences between predictions due to the three algorithms, the non-negligible influence of the mismatch between planned and postoperative maxillary position, and the learning curve associated with sophisticated programs like PFEM.

Type: Article
Title: Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: a clinical comparison of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and probabilistic finite element modelling
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.008
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.008
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: soft tissue prediction, virtual surgery planning, craniofacial surgery, Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, finite element modelling
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular Science > Childrens Cardiovascular Disease
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Developmental Biology and Cancer Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060467
Downloads since deposit
217Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item