Crossley, NK; (2019) Is R2P Still Controversial? Continuity and Change in the Debate on 'Humanitarian Intervention'. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 10.1080/09557571.2018.1516196. (In press).

Preview

Text R2P_Still_Controversial_Review_Article_Cam_Rev_Int_Affairs.pdf - Accepted Version Download (725kB) | Preview

Abstract

Is the responsibility to protect (R2P) still controversial? The question is important because if R2P was no longer controversial, this would suggest that the principle is on track to consolidation as an international norm. The article assesses the impact of 16 years of sustained R2P advocacy and its influence on arguments within the scholarly community, and discusses the impact this engagement has had on the outline and substance of the principle itself. A survey of the development of the academic debate since 2005 suggests that the ‘responsibility to protect’ has successfully replaced ‘humanitarian intervention’ in international discourse, but that the principle remains controversial, especially beyond the policy community, particularly in the world of academe, in the humanitarian aid sector and religious organizations and with states with a colonial past.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item