UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden in Patients With Heart Failure and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: The Importance of Renal Function

Babu, GG; Webber, M; Providencia, R; Kumar, S; Gopalamurugan, A; Rogers, DP; Daw, HL; ... Segal, OR; + view all (2016) Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden in Patients With Heart Failure and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: The Importance of Renal Function. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology , 27 (11) pp. 1328-1336. 10.1111/jce.13080. Green open access

[thumbnail of Bebiano Da Providencia E Costa_CKD PAPER MARCH 2016.pdf]
Preview
Text
Bebiano Da Providencia E Costa_CKD PAPER MARCH 2016.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for arrhythmias in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effects of CKD on ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator (CRT‐D) devices in a primary prevention setting are unknown. Objective: To determine whether baseline CKD is associated with increased risk of VA in patients implanted with primary prevention CRT‐D devices. Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, 199 consecutive primary prevention CRT‐D recipients (2005–2010) were stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels prior to device implantation with 106 (53.2%) ≥CKD III (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (CKD group). CKD group patients were significantly older (70.0 ± 10 years vs. 61.3 ± 12 years, P < 0.05) with higher prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy (56.2% vs. 40.2%, P < 0.05). Detected ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes resulting in device therapy occurred significantly more frequently in the CKD group [40/106(37.8%)] than controls [24/93(25.8%)], (odd ratio [OR] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01–3.2, P = 0.05). At 5‐year follow‐up, interval censored data analysis showed 41% VT/VF incidence in the CKD group compared to 24% incidence in controls (P < 0.05). Cox proportional hazards model identified CKD > III as the only predictor of sustained VA in this group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.92, CI = 1.39–6.1, P = 0.004). Conclusion: Baseline CKD is a strong independent risk factor for VA in primary prevention CRT‐D recipients. Further understanding of the underlying arrhythmogenic mechanisms relating to CKD may be of interest to allow appropriate correction and prevention. Device programming in this cohort may need to reflect this increased risk.

Type: Article
Title: Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden in Patients With Heart Failure and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: The Importance of Renal Function
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/jce.13080
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13080
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: cardiac resynchronization therapy, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, renal failure
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Cardiovascular Science > Clinical Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10057442
Downloads since deposit
176Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item