UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Critical Analysis of Evidence About the Impacts of Faculty Development in Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Rapid Evidence Assessment

Newman, M; Reeves, S; Fletcher, S; (2018) Critical Analysis of Evidence About the Impacts of Faculty Development in Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Rapid Evidence Assessment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions , 38 (2) pp. 137-144. 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000200. Green open access

[thumbnail of Newman , Reeves,  Fletcher , Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2018 Critical Analysis of Evidence About the Impacts of Faculty Development in Systematic Reviews_Author Final .pdf]
Preview
Text
Newman , Reeves, Fletcher , Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2018 Critical Analysis of Evidence About the Impacts of Faculty Development in Systematic Reviews_Author Final .pdf - Accepted Version

Download (551kB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Faculty Development (FD) encompasses a range of learning activities undertaken to prepare clinical teachers for their various roles as educators, leaders, and scholars. This article presents the findings of a systematic rapid evidence assessment that aimed to investigate the impact of FD on clinical teachers. METHODS: We searched the published and gray literature for systematic reviews of FD to identify evidence to help inform judgments about which kinds of FD activities are effective for which groups of clinical teachers. RESULTS: After screening the literature, we found seven systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Following a critical analysis of these reviews, we found that they contained a number of limitations in relation to their use of review methods and reporting of results. DISCUSSION: On the basis of the analysis presented in this systematic rapid evidence assessment, we conclude that the included reviews do not provide high-quality evidence to effectively support decisions about choices of FD activities, even where the review authors made positive claims about impact. Suggestions are provided to improve the quality of systematic reviews in this area.

Type: Article
Title: Critical Analysis of Evidence About the Impacts of Faculty Development in Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Rapid Evidence Assessment
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000200
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000200
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10053378
Downloads since deposit
100Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item