UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Quantified Uncertainties in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment: What Can Be Concluded?

Mendoza Beltran, A; Prado, V; Font Vivanco, D; Henriksson, PJG; Guinée, JB; Heijungs, R; (2018) Quantified Uncertainties in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment: What Can Be Concluded? Environmental Science & Technology , 52 (4) pp. 2152-2161. 10.1021/acs.est.7b06365. Green open access

[thumbnail of acs.est.7b06365.pdf]
Preview
Text
acs.est.7b06365.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Interpretation of comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) results can be challenging in the presence of uncertainty. To aid in interpreting such results under the goal of any comparative LCA, we aim to provide guidance to practitioners by gaining insights into uncertainty-statistics methods (USMs). We review five USMs-discernibility analysis, impact category relevance, overlap area of probability distributions, null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), and modified NHST-and provide a common notation, terminology, and calculation platform. We further cross-compare all USMs by applying them to a case study on electric cars. USMs belong to a confirmatory or an exploratory statistics' branch, each serving different purposes to practitioners. Results highlight that common uncertainties and the magnitude of differences per impact are key in offering reliable insights. Common uncertainties are particularly important as disregarding them can lead to incorrect recommendations. On the basis of these considerations, we recommend the modified NHST as a confirmatory USM. We also recommend discernibility analysis as an exploratory USM along with recommendations for its improvement, as it disregards the magnitude of the differences. While further research is necessary to support our conclusions, the results and supporting material provided can help LCA practitioners in delivering a more robust basis for decision-making.

Type: Article
Title: Quantified Uncertainties in Comparative Life Cycle Assessment: What Can Be Concluded?
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06365
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06365
Language: English
Additional information: ACS AuthorChoice - This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. For more info see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10043540
Downloads since deposit
121Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item