UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

University Rankings and Social Science

Marginson, S; (2014) University Rankings and Social Science. European Journal of Education , 49 (1) pp. 45-59. 10.1111/ejed.12061. Green open access

[thumbnail of EJE rankings accepted Oct 2013.pdf]
Preview
Text
EJE rankings accepted Oct 2013.pdf

Download (723kB) | Preview

Abstract

University rankings widely affect the behaviours of prospective students and their families, university executive leaders, academic faculty, governments and investors in higher education. Yet the social science foundations of global rankings receive little scrutiny. Rankings that simply recycle reputation without any necessary connection to real outputs are of no common value. It is necessary that rankings be soundly based in scientific terms if a virtuous relationship between performance and ranking is to be established, the worst potentials of rankings are to be constrained, and rankings are optimised as a source of comparative information. This article evaluates six ranking systems, Shanghai ARWU, Leiden University, QS, Scopus, Times Higher Education and U-Multirank, according to six social science criteria and two behavioural criteria. The social science criteria are materiality (rankings must be grounded in the observable higher education world), objectivity (opinion surveys should not be used), externality (ranked universities should not be a source of data about themselves), comprehensiveness (rankings should cover the broadest possible range of functions), particularity (ranking systems should eschew multi-indicators with weights, or proxy measures) and ordinal proportionality (vertical distinctions between universities should not be exaggerated). The behavioural criteria are the alignment of the ranking with tendencies to improved performance of all institutions and countries, and transparency, meaning accessibility to strategy making designed to maximize institutional position. The pure research rankings rate well overall but lack comprehensiveness. U-Multirank is also strong under most criteria but stymied by its 100 per cent reliance on subjective data collected via survey.

Type: Article
Title: University Rankings and Social Science
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12061
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12061
Language: English
Additional information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Marginson, S; (2014) University Rankings and Social Science. European Journal of Education , 49 (1) pp. 45-59, which has been published in final form at http:/dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12061. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Keywords: University rankings; International comparisons; Globalisation; Higher education policy; Research policy and management; Performance indicators
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475530
Downloads since deposit
1,026Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item