Nowell, Mark;
Sparks, Rachel;
Zombori, Gergely;
Miserocchi, Anna;
Rodionov, Roman;
Diehl, Beate;
Wehner, Tim;
... Duncan, John; + view all
(2016)
Comparison of Computer-Assisted Planning and Manual Planning for Depth Electrode Implantations in Epilepsy.
Journal of Neurosurgery
, 124
(6)
pp. 1820-1828.
10.3171/2015.6.JNS15487.
Preview |
Text
Nowell_jns15-487_pub_version_online_pdf.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
OBJECT: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of multitrajectory computer-assisted planning software (CAP) to plan stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode arrangements. // METHODS: A cohort of 18 patients underwent SEEG for evaluation of epilepsy at a single center between August 2013 and August 2014. Planning of electrodes was performed manually and stored using EpiNav software. CAP was developed as a planning tool in EpiNav. The user preselects a set of cerebral targets and optimized trajectory constraints, and then runs an automated search of potential scalp entry points and associated trajectories. Each trajectory is associated with metrics for a safety profile, derived from the minimal distance to vascular structures, and an efficacy profile, derived from the proportion of depth electrodes that are within or adjacent to gray matter. CAP was applied to the cerebral targets used in the cohort of 18 previous manually planned implantations to generate new multitrajectory implantation plans. A comparison was then undertaken for trajectory safety and efficacy. // RESULTS: CAP was applied to 166 electrode targets in 18 patients. There were significant improvements in both the safety profile and efficacy profile of trajectories generated by CAP compared with manual planning (p < 0.05). Three independent neurosurgeons assessed the feasibility of the trajectories generated by CAP, with 131 (78.9%) of 166 trajectories deemed suitable for implementation in clinical practice. CAP was performed in real time, with a median duration of 8 minutes for each patient, although this does not include the time taken for data preparation. // CONCLUSIONS: CAP is a promising tool to plan SEEG implantations. CAP provides feasible depth electrode arrangements, with quantitatively greater safety and efficacy profiles, and with a substantial reduction in duration of planning within the 3D multimodality framework.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
