Singh, RR; Nah, SA; Roebuck, DJ; Eaton, S; Pierro, A; Curry, JI; PEG-RIG trial collaborators, .; (2017) Double-blind randomized clinical trial of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy in children. British Journal of Surgery , 104 (12) pp. 1620-1627. 10.1002/bjs.10687.

Preview

Text PEG_vs_RIG_Paper_Br_J_Surg_Accepted Version.pdf - Accepted Version Download (540kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this RCT was to determine whether radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) in children is associated with more complications than percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS: Children at a single tertiary children's hospital requiring a primary gastrostomy were randomized to PEG or RIG. Patients were followed by assessors blinded to the insertion method. Complications were recorded, assigned a severity score, and analysed by zero-inflated Poisson regression analysis on an intention-to-treat basis, adjusting for length of follow-up. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, 214 children were randomized (PEG, 107; RIG, 107), of whom 100 received PEG and 96 RIG. There was no significant difference in the number of complications between PEG and RIG groups (P = 0·875), or in the complication score: patients undergoing RIG had a 1·04 (95 per cent c.i. 0·89 to 1·21) times higher complication score than those who underwent PEG (P = 0·597). Only age had an independent significant effect on complication score, with older patients having a 0·97 (0·95 to 1·00) times lower complication score per year. CONCLUSION: PEG and RIG are both safe methods of gastrostomy insertion with a low rate of major complications.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONCSVXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item