Reiss, MJ; Abrahams, I; Sharpe, R; (2016) To DAPS or to IAPS: that is the question. In: Eilks, I and Markic, S and Ralle, B, (eds.) Science Education Research and Practical Work A Collection of Invited Papers Inspired by the 23rd Symposium on Chemistry and Science Education Held at the TU Dortmund University, May 26-28, 2016. (pp. 119-130). Shaker Verlag: Düren, Germany.

Preview

Text Reiss_Abrahams, Reiss & Sharpe Practical work.pdf Download (479kB) | Preview

Abstract

Abstract This article reviews how practical work, including practical skills, is currently summatively assessed in school science in a number of countries and makes comparisons with how other subjects, such as music and geography, summatively assess skills. Whilst practical skills in school science are clearly valued as being of importance, there is a lack of clarity as to what these skills actually are and how they might, most effectively, be validly assessed. Countries vary greatly in the extent to which they employ in school science what we term ‘Direct Assessment of Practical Skills’ (DAPS) or ‘Indirect Assessment of Practical Skills’ (IAPS). Each of these approaches has advantages and disadvantages but we conclude that too great a reliance on IAPS reduces the likelihood that practical work will be taught and learnt as well as it might be.

Download activity - last month

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item