Khan, KN;
Islam, F;
Holder, GE;
Robson, A;
Webster, AR;
Moore, AT;
Michaelides, M;
(2018)
Normal Electrooculography in Best Disease and Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy.
Retina
, 38
(2)
pp. 379-386.
10.1097/IAE.0000000000001523.
Preview |
Text
Michaelides_Normal Electrooculography in BD and ARB.pdf - Accepted Version Download (350kB) | Preview |
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the electrooculogram (EOG) in a large series of patients with Best disease and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive cases at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Patients with Best disease or autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy who, after electrophysiologic testing, had a normal or atypical EOG light rise were identified. Main outcome measure was EOG amplitude, clinical phenotype and genotype. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were identified with likely disease-causing sequence variants in BEST1 (99 Best disease and 14 autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy). Electrooculograms had been performed in 75 patients. Twenty patients (27%) had no detectable light rise (Arden ratio of 100%) and 49 (65%) had Arden ratios of between 100% to 165%. Six patients (8%) were found to have an EOG light rise of >165%. No cases demonstrated significant interocular asymmetry in EOG amplitude. CONCLUSION: The current work provides significant clinical evidence that the EOG phenotype in Best disease and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy is more variable than currently appreciated. As a normal EOG may occur in the presence of a classical fundus appearance, the consequences of BEST1 mutation may be independently expressed, possibly mediated through differential effects on intracellular calcium homeostasis.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Normal Electrooculography in Best Disease and Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy |
Location: | United States |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001523 |
Publisher version: | http://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001523 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1559159 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |