Claxton, M;
Onwumere, J;
Fornells-Ambrojo, M;
(2017)
Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Frontiers in Psychology
, 8
, Article ARTN 371. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00371.
Preview |
Text
Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Family interventions for psychosis (FIp) are effective in reducing service user relapse and carer distress in people with schizophrenia-spectrum conditions. Several treatment and best practice guidelines recommend FIp for all people with schizophrenia. However, outcome findings in relation to early psychosis groups have been inconsistent. The current paper reports a systematic review and meta-analyses of articles that evaluated FIp in early psychosis with a clearly defined comparison group. A combination of electronic database searches (using PsychINFO, Medline, and CENTRAL), citation searches and hand searches of key journals and reviews was conducted. Peer-reviewed articles published in English from database inception to June 2016 were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP). Seventeen papers from 14 studies met inclusion criteria for review, the overall quality of which was moderate. Meta-analytic synthesis showed that FIp improved service user functioning and reduced the likelihood of relapse by the end of treatment. Psychotic symptoms were significantly reduced in the FIp group at follow up, but this was not evident at end of treatment. In terms of FIp target mechanisms, carers receiving FIp were more likely to shift from high to low expressed emotion and less likely to report patient focused criticism or engage in conflict communication than carers randomized to standard care. Carer burden and well-being were improved by the end of treatment but gains were not sustained at follow up. FIp had no impact on carer emotional over-involvement. The findings indicate that FIp is an effective intervention for early psychosis service users and their relatives. However, further research is required to establish which key therapeutic components of FIp are most effective for whom, in addition to understanding the mechanisms by which FIp might affect positive change.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00371 |
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00371 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | © 2017 Claxton, Onwumere and Fornells-Ambrojo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
| Keywords: | Social Sciences, Psychology, Multidisciplinary, Psychology, family intervention, early psychosis, schizophrenia, relapse, expressed emotion, caregiver burden, meta-analysis, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, 1ST EPISODE PSYCHOSIS, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT SCALE, EARLY-ONSET PSYCHOSIS, EXPRESSED EMOTION, 1ST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS, FOLLOW-UP, 1ST-ONSET PSYCHOSIS, PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY, UNTREATED PSYCHOSIS |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1558886 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
