Pett, SL;
Amin, J;
Horban, A;
Andrade-Villanueva, J;
Losso, M;
Porteiro, N;
Madero, JS;
... MARCH study group, .; + view all
(2018)
Week 96 results of the randomized, multicentre Maraviroc Switch (MARCH) study.
HIV Medicine
, 19
(1)
pp. 65-71.
10.1111/hiv.12532.
Preview |
Text
MARCH manuscript for HIV Medicine SHORT REPORT with abstract included 17Apr2017.pdf - Accepted Version Download (127kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
MARCH manuscript for HIV Medicine Figure 1 17Apr2017.pdf - Accepted Version Download (9kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
MARCH manuscript forHIV Medicine Table 1 17Apr2017.pdf - Accepted Version Download (10kB) | Preview |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Maraviroc Switch (MARCH) study week 48 data demonstrated that maraviroc, a chemokine receptor-5 (CCR5) inhibitor, was a safe and effective switch for the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) component of a two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] plus PI/r-based antiretroviral regimen in patients with R5-tropic virus. Here we report the durability of this finding. METHODS: MARCH, an international, multicentre, randomized, 96-week open-label switch study, enrolled HIV-1-infected adults with R5-tropic virus who were stable (> 24 weeks) and virologically suppressed [plasma viral load (pVL) < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL]. Participants were randomized to continue their current PI/r-based regimen (PI/r) or to switch to MVC plus two N(t)RTIs (MVC) (1:2 randomization). The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion with pVL < 200 copies/mL at 96 weeks. The switch arm was defined as noninferior if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference was < -12% in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety endpoints (the difference in the mean change from baseline or a comparison of proportions) were analysed as key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Eighty-two (PI/r) and 156 (MVC) participants were randomized and included in the ITT analysis; 71 (87%) and 130 (83%) were in follow-up and on therapy at week 96. At week 96, 89.0% and 90.4% in the PI/r and MVC arms, respectively, had pVL < 50 copies/mL (95% CI -6.6, 10.2). Moreover, in those switching away from PI/r, there were significant reductions in mean total cholesterol (differences 0.31 mmol/L; P = 0.02) and triglycerides (difference 0.44 mmol/L; P < 0.001). Changes in CD4 T-cell count, renal function, and serious and nonserious adverse events were similar in the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: MVC as a switch for a PI/r is safe and effective at maintaining virological suppression while having significant lipid benefits over 96 weeks.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
