UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Handling Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys

Pennington, M; Gomes, M; Donaldson, C; (2017) Handling Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys. Medical Decision Making , 37 (6) pp. 623-634. 10.1177/0272989X17691771. Green open access

[thumbnail of Gomes-M_handling protest responses_.pdf]
Preview
Text
Gomes-M_handling protest responses_.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (862kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Protest responses, whereby respondents refuse to state the value they place on the health gain, are commonly encountered in contingent valuation (CV) studies, and they tend to be excluded from analyses. Such an approach will be biased if protesters differ from non-protesters on characteristics that predict their responses. The Heckman selection model has been commonly used to adjust for protesters, but its underlying assumptions may be implausible in this context. We present a multiple imputation (MI) approach to appropriately address protest responses in CV studies, and compare it with the Heckman selection model. METHODS: This study exploits data from the multinational EuroVaQ study, which surveyed respondents' willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Here, our simulation study assesses the relative performance of MI and Heckman selection models across different realistic settings grounded in the EuroVaQ study, including scenarios with different proportions of missing data and non-response mechanisms. We then illustrate the methods in the EuroVaQ study for estimating mean WTP for a QALY gain. RESULTS: We find that MI provides lower bias and mean squared error compared with the Heckman approach across all considered scenarios. The simulations suggest that the Heckman approach can lead to considerable underestimation or overestimation of mean WTP due to violations in the normality assumption, even after log-transforming the WTP responses. The case study illustrates that protesters are associated with a lower mean WTP for a QALY gain compared with non-protesters, but that the results differ according to method for handling protesters. CONCLUSIONS: MI is an appropriate method for addressing protest responses in CV studies.

Type: Article
Title: Handling Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17691771
Publisher version: http://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X17691771
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: EuroVaQ, Heckman selection, contingent valuation, missing data, multiple imputation
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Applied Health Research
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1553042
Downloads since deposit
172Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item