Brunton, VJ; Dickson, K; khatwa, M; Caird, J; Oliver, S; Hinds, K; Thomas, J; (2016) Developing evidence-informed, employer-led workplace health: Final report. EPPI-Centre, UCL Institute of Education: London, UK.

Preview

Text Brunton_Employer-led workplace health 2016 Brunton.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

What do we want to know? We sought to understand whether workplace health programmes (WHPs) are effective for improving health and business outcomes, and to identify the characteristics of WHPs that are thought to influence their success. To address these issues, we undertook a systematic review of three sources of evidence: systematic reviews examining intervention effectiveness; research on stakeholders’ views and experiences; and key workplace health policy documents. / What did we find? We identified 24 systematic reviews of WHPs which examined statistically the impact on a variety of outcomes, including mental health, weight management, absenteeism (and its costs), work ability and job stress. The reviews demonstrated that workplace health interventions are effective in improving health and business outcomes, and that the magnitude of effects on those outcomes is modest. Evidence from 10 views studies and 17 policy documents were integrated with evidence from systematic reviews to identify key characteristics of WHPs. Four characteristics were identified across each of the three evidence sources, suggesting that they could be implemented to good effect: financial commitment, ease of uptake, accessibility, and structures to promote social support. Five characteristics were identified in systematic reviews and views studies but have yet to be addressed by policy recommendations; these included the extent of policy integration, the importance of the implementer’s role within the company, the content of an intervention, whether the intervention is tailored or individualised, and issues related to acceptability. Four characteristics were identified as important in views studies or policy documents but had not been examined in systematic reviews, suggesting a need for future evaluation. These included managerial support, organisational support, channels of communication and the provision of tailored advice. The provider approach and the use of web-based technologies were identified in views research only. Each of these characteristics can be implemented in a variety of ways, suggesting creative possibilities for the ways in which businesses could integrate them into employer-led workplace health. / What are the conclusions? The findings suggest that employers can derive benefits from establishing WHPs, both for the business and with respect to their employees’ health. Interventions that are supported by organisational policy, focus their content on specific health issues and engage employees have been shown to be effective and are supported by stakeholder research and policy documents. Employers may find additional benefit if they also include specific characteristics related to the context in which a WHP intervention takes place, is implemented or is received by participants. The impacts of many WHP characteristics on health and business outcomes have yet to be evaluated and should be integrated into future WHP intervention evaluations. / How did we get these results? Comprehensive searching of electronic databases and websites was carried out to identify the three relevant datasets. Using framework synthesis, we combined evidence from the systematic reviews, views studies and policy documents by using a framework of characteristics potentially influencing workplace health effectiveness. Data analysis themes were then organised to produce tabular and narrative summaries of key characteristics of WHPs to produce an overall narrative.

Download activity - last month

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item