Bubb, S;
Earley, P;
Totterdell, M;
(2005)
Accountability and responsibility: 'Rogue' school leaders and the induction of new teachers in England.
Oxford Review of Education
, 31
(2)
pp. 255-272.
Preview |
Text
Bubb2005Accountability255paper.pdf - Accepted Version Download (181kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Text
Bubb2005Accountability255tables.pdf - Accepted Version Download (86kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper considers the professional responsibility of schools in England to provide effective induction practices in the context of a central government mandated policy. It looks at individual schools as ?habitats? for induction and the role of school leaders and LEAs as facilitators or inhibitors. Notions of professional responsibility and public accountability are used to analyse the small number of ?rogue? school leaders who, within the new legislative framework, treat new teachers unprofessionally and waste public resources. A typology of ?rogue? schools that are in some way deviant in transgressing induction requirements is developed and the various sanctions that can be deployed against such schools are examined. How LEAs handle their monitoring and accountability role and manage deviant schools is considered. Finally, suggestions are made for improvements, such as the need to clarify professional responsibility and refine systems of professional accountability.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Accountability and responsibility: 'Rogue' school leaders and the induction of new teachers in England |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Learning and Leadership |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1533370 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |