Alderson, P;
Goodey, C;
(1998)
Theories of consent.
BMJ
, 317
(7168)
pp. 1313-1315.
10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1313.
Preview |
Text
Alderson_Theories of consent 1998.pdf Download (145kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Consent is understood differently by various disciplines and professions, and also in various theoretical models.1 In this article we review the advantages and limitations of theories about real consent, constructed consent, functionalist and critical consent, and postmodern choice. The article shows how an analysis of theories can clarify practical knowledge about the advantages of and problems in obtaining consent, which will help everyday practice and research.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Theories of consent |
| Location: | England |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1313 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1313 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1483871 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
