UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Toward a scientific approach to identifying and understanding indicators of radicalization and terrorist intent: Eight key problems

Gill, P; (2016) Toward a scientific approach to identifying and understanding indicators of radicalization and terrorist intent: Eight key problems. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management , 2 (3) pp. 187-191. 10.1037/tam0000047. Green open access

[img]
Preview
Text
Gill-P_Commentary_v1.pdf

Download (531kB) | Preview

Abstract

Comments on the original articles by Meloy, Roshdi, Glaz-Ocik, & Hoffmann (see record 2016-18836-002), by Böckler, Hoffmann, & Zick (see record 2016-18836-003), by Meloy, Habermeyer, & Guldimann (see record 2016-18836-004), and by Van Der Meer (see record 2016-18836-005). Collectively, the articles contained in this issue offer a lot of interesting and insightful material on radicalization/violence indicators and the validity of the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol–18 (TRAP-18). They do this through testing the tool against a medium-sized sample of 22 cases (Meloy, Roshdi, Glaz-Ocik, & Hoffmann, 2015), and individual case studies ranging from the very famous (Breivik in the work of Meloy, Habermeyer, & Guldimann, 2015), to the not so famous (“U” in the work of Böckler, Hoffmann, & Zick, 2015), to the barely remembered (Lucheni in the work of Van Der Meer, 2015). They make important methodological contributions (discussions surrounding intercoder reliability) and substantive contributions in terms of new data generation and providing granular level detail on a couple of largely overlooked and unstudied cases. The results illustrate that time and again, various distal and proximal indicators built into the TRAP-18 were apparent. However, in a very short space of time, the empirical study of terrorist behavior has made some large steps with multiple data-driven, methodologically rich projects producing a lot of insight. The literature is finally at a point at which data access is not as much of a problem as it was previously. The next big challenges are essentially conceptual, and hopefully this commentary can work toward synthesizing and standardizing approaches across these multiple data-driven endeavors. To progress, we need to think more carefully about base rates, protective factors, weighting/clustering risk factors, thinking about the “terrorist” in a more nuanced way, and taking temporality into account.

Type: Article
Title: Toward a scientific approach to identifying and understanding indicators of radicalization and terrorist intent: Eight key problems
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1037/tam0000047
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tam0000047
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2016 American Psychological Association. All rights reserved. This article may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Security and Crime Science
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1482248
Downloads since deposit
602Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item