UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Down's syndrome: cost, quality and value of life

Alderson, P; (2001) Down's syndrome: cost, quality and value of life. Social Science & Medicine , 53 (5) pp. 627-638. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00365-8. Green open access

[thumbnail of Alderson_2001Down's627.pdf]

Download (300kB) | Preview


Routine prenatal screening is based on the assumption that it is reasonable for prospective parents to choose to prevent a life with Down's syndrome. This paper questions whether Down's syndrome necessarily involves the costs, limitations and suffering which are assumed in the prenatal literature, and examines the lack of evidence about the value and quality of life with Down's syndrome. Tensions between the aims of prenatal screening policies to support women's personal choices, prevent distress, and reduce the suffering and costs of disability, versus the inadvertent effects of screening which can undermine these aims, are considered. Strengths and weaknesses in medically and socially based models of research about disability, and their validity and reliability are reviewed. From exploratory qualitative research with 40 adults who have congenital conditions which are tested for prenatally, interviews with five adults with Down's syndrome are reported. Interviewees discuss their relationships, education and employment, leisure interests, hopes, aspects of themselves and of society they would like to change, and their views on prenatal screening. They show how some people with Down's syndrome live creative, rewarding and fairly independent lives, and are not inevitably non-contributing dependents. Like the other 35 interviewees, they illustrate the importance of social supports, and their problems with excluding attitudes and barriers. Much more social research with people who have congenital conditions is required, if prenatal screening policies and counselling are to be evidence based.

Type: Article
Title: Down's syndrome: cost, quality and value of life
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00365-8
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00365-8
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Empirical Approach, Professional Patient Relationship, Abortion, Eugenic, Adult, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Cost of Illness, Down Syndrome, England, Female, Genetic Counseling, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Mentally Disabled Persons, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Stereotyping, Value of Life
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1482041
Downloads since deposit
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item