Raible, L;
(2016)
The Extraterritoriality of the ECHR: Why Jaloud and Pisari Should be Read as Game Changers.
European Human Rights Law Review
(2)
pp. 161-168.
Preview |
Text
Raible – 2016 – Extraterritoriality of the ECHR.pdf - Accepted Version Download (200kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article argues that Jaloud v Netherlands and Pisari v Moldova and Russia should be interpreted as changing the approach to the extraterritorial application of the European Convention on Human Rights. It advances three key arguments. First, it suggests a reading of these cases pointing to the fact that the European Court of Human Rights is no longer relying on the separation of the different models of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Secondly, it advances a model of jurisdiction based on power understood as a potential for control and the application of rules to the concerned individuals. Thirdly, it argues that this model is preferable to the previous ones because it explains hard cases just as well or better and, in addition, captures a distinct understanding of the function of human rights recognized in the Convention.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | The Extraterritoriality of the ECHR: Why Jaloud and Pisari Should be Read as Game Changers |
| Location: | UK |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in E.H.R.L.R. following peer review. The definitive published version E.H.R.L.R. 2016, 2, 161-168 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service. |
| Keywords: | Human Rights, Extraterritoriality, European Convention of Human Rights |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1477577 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
