Rumbold, BE;
Wilson, J;
(2016)
Reasonable disagreement and the generally unacceptable: a philosophical analysis of Making Fair Choices.
Health Economics, Policy and Law
, 11
(1)
pp. 91-96.
10.1017/S1744133114000577.
Preview |
Text
v2.3 On Making Fair Choices - final.pdf - Accepted Version Download (80kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this article we consider the conclusions and recommendations of the World Health Organisation's report Making Fair Choices from a philosophical perspective. In particular we reflect on the report's return to substantive claims about justice in the allocation of health care resources and its argument that certain trade-offs are 'generally unacceptable'.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Reasonable disagreement and the generally unacceptable: a philosophical analysis of Making Fair Choices |
| Location: | England |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S1744133114000577 |
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744133114000577 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | © Cambridge University Press 2015. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Dept of Philosophy |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1475601 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
