Dannenbaum, KTJ;
(2015)
Dual Attribution in the Context of Military Operations.
International Organizations Law Review
, 12
(2)
pp. 401-426.
10.1163/15723747-01202007.
Preview |
Text
Dannenbaum_Dual Attribution_17.08.2015.pdf Download (322kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article considers the state of the doctrine on dual attribution in military operations. The rapidly expanding jurisprudence on cooperative military ventures has yet to coalesce around a single normative framework. The role of the DARIO and DARSIWA in that realm has been decidedly mixed, perhaps predictably given the inconsistency between the two codes. The most hopeful developments have come in the Netherlands, with the elaboration of a bifocal, preventive interpretation of DARIO article 7. However, whether that framework will resonate elsewhere is uncertain. Thus far, the concept of dual attribution itself has played an odd role. It has been affirmed repeatedly in theory, but the primary value of its theoretical possibility has been in empowering courts to hear cases they might otherwise have avoided, while failing actually to attribute conduct to two or more entities.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Dual Attribution in the Context of Military Operations |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1163/15723747-01202007 |
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01202007 |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | dual attribution, shared responsibility, peacekeeping, cooperative military enterprise |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1471588 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
