Mancini, F;
Steinitz, H;
Steckelmacher, J;
Iannetti, GD;
Haggard, P;
(2015)
Poor judgment of distance between nociceptive stimuli.
Cognition
, 143
pp. 41-47.
10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.004.
Preview |
Text
Mancini_Poorjudgment of distance between nociceptive stimuli.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Although pain is traditionally assumed to be poorly localized, recent work indicates that spatial acuity for nociception is surprisingly high. Here we investigated whether the nervous system can also accurately estimate the distance between two nociceptive stimuli. Estimating distance implies a metric representation of spatial relations, a property that underlies abilities such as perceiving the size of external objects. We presented pairs of simultaneous nociceptive or non-nociceptive somatosensory stimuli, and asked participants to judge the distance between them. Judgments of distance between nociceptive stimuli were much worse than judgments of distance between non-nociceptive tactile stimuli, even on skin regions where spatial acuity for nociception exceeded spatial acuity for touch. Control experiments ruled out explanations based on inaccurate localization of double nociceptive stimuli. Thus, the nervous system poorly represents the distance between two nociceptive stimuli. The dissociation between high spatial acuity and poor distance judgment in the nociceptive system may reflect a specialization for computing accurate spatial representations useful to protect the body, rather than to perceive the size of external objects.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
