UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England

Solmi, F; Von Wagner, C; Kobayashi, LC; Raine, R; Wardle, J; Morris, S; (2015) Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England. Social Science & Medicine , 134 pp. 76-86. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.010. Green open access

[thumbnail of Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England.pdf]
Preview
Text
Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England.pdf

Download (571kB) | Preview

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second largest cause of cancer death in the UK. Since 2010, CRC screening based on Faecal Occult Blood testing has been offered by the NHS in England biennially to all persons age 60-69 years. Several studies have demonstrated a gradient in uptake using area-level markers of socio-economic status (SES), but few have examined the individual-level contributors to the gradient. We aimed to quantify the extent of SES inequality in CRC screening uptake in England using individual-level data, and to identify individual factors associated with this inequality. We used data from 1833 participants (aged 61-69) in Wave 5 (collected in years 2010/11) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) eligible for having been sent at least one CRC screening invitation. Uptake was defined by self-report of ever having been screened as part of the National Screening Programme. We assessed socio-economic inequality using the corrected concentration index of uptake against SES rank, which was derived by regressing a range of SES markers against net non-pension household wealth. Other demographic and health-related variables were included in the analysis. Factors associated with inequality were measured using concentration index decomposition. There was a significant pro-rich gradient in screening uptake (concentration index: 0.16, 95% CI:0.11-0.22), mostly explained within our model by differences in non-pension wealth (38.7%), partner screening status (15.9%), sickness/disability (13.5%), and health literacy (8.5%). Interventions aimed at reducing inequalities in CRC screening uptake should focus on improving acceptability of screening in populations with low levels of education and literacy barriers.

Type: Article
Title: Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.010
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.010
Language: English
Additional information: © 2015. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Colorectal cancer, Concentration, Decomposition analyses, ELSA, England, Health literacy, Index, Inequalities, Screening
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Applied Health Research
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1467026
Downloads since deposit
367Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item