Orfanou, V;
Rehren, T;
(2014)
A (not so) dangerous method: pXRF vs. EPMA-WDS analyses of copper-based artefacts.
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
10.1007/s12520-014-0198-z.
Preview |
PDF
art%3A10.1007%2Fs12520-014-0198-z.pdf Available under License : See the attached licence file. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Analysis of metal objects with portable and handheld X-ray fluorescence spectrometry has become increasingly popular in recent years. Here, methodological concerns that apply to non-destructive, surface examination with XRF instruments of ancient metal artefacts are discussed based on the comparative analyses of a set of copper-based objects by means of portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) and electron probe microanalyser (EPMA). The analytical investigation aims to explore issues of instrument comparability and reliability of the non-invasive pXRF results. The different analytical approaches produce a comparable pattern for the major element concentrations, but substantial variation is evident when it comes to the absolute values for major and minor/trace elements.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | A (not so) dangerous method: pXRF vs. EPMA-WDS analyses of copper-based artefacts |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12520-014-0198-z |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-014-0198-z |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Institute of Archaeology UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Institute of Archaeology > Institute of Archaeology Gordon Square |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1456630 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |