UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Cost-effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy compared to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment–resistant severe depression: a decision model

Hunter, RM; (2014) Cost-effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy compared to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment–resistant severe depression: a decision model. Psychological Medicine 10.1017/S0033291714002554. Green open access

[thumbnail of Creative Commons Attribution Licence]
Preview
PDF (Creative Commons Attribution Licence)
Cost_effectiveness.pdf

Download (288kB)

Abstract

Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is widely applied to treat severe depression resistant to standard treatment. Results from previous studies comparing the cost-effectiveness of this technique with treatment alternatives such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are conflicting. Methods: We conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing ECT alone, rTMS alone and rTMS followed by ECT when rTMS fails under the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service. The analysis is based on a Markov model which simulates the costs and health outcomes of individuals treated under these alternatives over a 12 month period. Data to populate this model were extracted and synthesised from a series of randomised controlled trials and other studies that have compared these techniques on the patient group of interest. We measure effectiveness using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and characterise the uncertainty using probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: ECT alone is found to be less costly and more effective than rTMS alone, while the strategy of providing rTMS followed by ECT when rTMS fails is the most expensive and effective option. The incremental cost per QALY gained of this latter strategy is found to be above the reference willingness to pay threshold used in these types of studies in Spain and other countries. The probability that ECT alone is the most cost-effective alternative was estimated to be around 70%. Conclusions: ECT is likely to be the most cost-effective option in the treatment of resistant severe depression for a willingness to pay of 30,000€ per QALY.

Type: Article
Title: Cost-effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy compared to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment–resistant severe depression: a decision model
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291714002554
Publisher version: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna...
Language: English
Additional information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness, Electroconvulsive therapy, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, Depression, Decision model
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1450252
Downloads since deposit
244Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item