UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers

Oliver, K; Innvar, S; Lorenc, T; Woodman, J; Thomas, J; (2014) A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research , 14 , Article 2. 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1472-6963-14-2.pdf]
Preview
PDF
1472-6963-14-2.pdf

Download (885kB)
[thumbnail of Additional file 1:  Sample search strategy.] Other (Additional file 1: Sample search strategy.)
1472-6963-14-2-s1.docx

Download (11kB)
[thumbnail of Additional file 2:  Characteristics of included studies.] Other (Additional file 2: Characteristics of included studies.)
1472-6963-14-2-s2.docx

Download (208kB)
[thumbnail of Additional file 3:  Research checklist.] Other (Additional file 3: Research checklist.)
1472-6963-14-2-s3.docx

Download (17kB)

Abstract

Background The gap between research and practice or policy is often described as a problem. To identify new barriers of and facilitators to the use of evidence by policymakers, and assess the state of research in this area, we updated a systematic review. Methods Systematic review. We searched online databases including Medline, Embase, SocSci Abstracts, CDS, DARE, Psychlit, Cochrane Library, NHSEED, HTA, PAIS, IBSS (Search dates: July 2000 - September 2012). Studies were included if they were primary research or systematic reviews about factors affecting the use of evidence in policy. Studies were coded to extract data on methods, topic, focus, results and population. Results 145 new studies were identified, of which over half were published after 2010. Thirteen systematic reviews were included. Compared with the original review, a much wider range of policy topics was found. Although still primarily in the health field, studies were also drawn from criminal justice, traffic policy, drug policy, and partnership working. The most frequently reported barriers to evidence uptake were poor access to good quality relevant research, and lack of timely research output. The most frequently reported facilitators were collaboration between researchers and policymakers, and improved relationships and skills. There is an increasing amount of research into new models of knowledge transfer, and evaluations of interventions such as knowledge brokerage. Conclusions Timely access to good quality and relevant research evidence, collaborations with policymakers and relationship- and skills-building with policymakers are reported to be the most important factors in influencing the use of evidence. Although investigations into the use of evidence have spread beyond the health field and into more countries, the main barriers and facilitators remained the same as in the earlier review. Few studies provide clear definitions of policy, evidence or policymaker. Nor are empirical data about policy processes or implementation of policy widely available. It is therefore difficult to describe the role of evidence and other factors influencing policy. Future research and policy priorities should aim to illuminate these concepts and processes, target the factors identified in this review, and consider new methods of overcoming the barriers described.

Type: Article
Title: A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
Language: English
Additional information: © 2014 Oliver et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1417336
Downloads since deposit
349Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item