UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A case-study in literalism? Dissecting the English approach to patent claim construction in light of Occlutech v AGA Medical

Fisher, MJ; (2011) A case-study in literalism? Dissecting the English approach to patent claim construction in light of Occlutech v AGA Medical. Intellectual Property Quarterly , 3 pp. 283-303.

[thumbnail of Fisher_ A case study in literalism Dissecting the English approach to patent claim construction in light of Occlutech v AGA Medical.pdf] Text
Fisher_ A case study in literalism Dissecting the English approach to patent claim construction in light of Occlutech v AGA Medical.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff

Download (315kB)

Abstract

The decisions of the Court of Appeal and the judge at first instance in Occlutech v AGA Medical Corp shed important light on the English courts' approach to patent claim construction. More palpably than any other case in recent years they illustrate why the prevailing attitude of the courts, following behind the House of Lords judgment in Kirin-Amgen,1 may demonstrate an unarticulated bias towards adopting a literal interpretation of the claims. The decisions are also noteworthy for their explicit reference to, and reliance upon, dictionary definitions of the words in issue when determining the patent's scope. Additionally the judgments provide proof, if proof were needed, that equivalency as a tool in patent construction is a concept that is as dead as Mr Palin's infamous parrot.

Type: Article
Title: A case-study in literalism? Dissecting the English approach to patent claim construction in light of Occlutech v AGA Medical
Publisher version: http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/Product...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions
Keywords: Claim construction, Declarations of non-infringement, European patents, Medical equipment, Patent claims
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1379526
Downloads since deposit
3Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item