Sperber, D;
Wilson, D;
(1996)
Fodor's frame problem and relevance theory - Response.
BEHAV BRAIN SCI
, 19
(3)
530 -532.
10.1017/S0140525X00082030.
![]() Preview |
PDF
download.13pdf.pdf Download (542kB) |
Abstract
Chiappe & Kukla argue that relevance theory fails to solve the frame problem as defined by Fodor. They are right. They are wrong, however, to take Fodor's frame problem too seriously. Fodor's concerns, on the other hand, even though they are wrongly framed, are worth addressing. We argue that relevance theory helps address them.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Fodor's frame problem and relevance theory - Response |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X00082030 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00082030 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996 |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Linguistics |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1331360 |
Downloads since deposit
404Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |