UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Why biological neuroscience cannot replace psychology

Chater, N; (1999) Why biological neuroscience cannot replace psychology. BEHAV BRAIN SCI , 22 (5) 834 - 834. 10.1017/S0140525X9926219X. Green open access

[img]
Preview
PDF
download1.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (41kB)

Abstract

Gold & Stoljar argue persuasively that there is presently not a good case for the "radical neuron doctrine." There are strong reasons to believe that this doctrine is false. An analogy between psychology and economics strongly throws the radical neuron doctrine into doubt.

Type: Article
Title: Why biological neuroscience cannot replace psychology
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X9926219X
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9926219X
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright 1999 Cambridge University Press
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Experimental Psychology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/124471
Downloads since deposit
217Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item