Hahn, U;
Chater, N;
(1998)
The notion of distal similarity is ill defined.
BEHAV BRAIN SCI
, 21
(4)
474 - 475.
10.1017/S0140525X98311255.
![[thumbnail of download5.pdf]](https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) Preview |
PDF
download5.pdf Download (45kB) |
Abstract
We argue that the notion of distal similarity on which Edelman's reconstruction of the process of perception and the nature of representation rests is ill defined. As a consequence, the mapping between world and description that is supposedly at stake is, in fact, a mapping between two different descriptions or "representations.".
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | The notion of distal similarity is ill defined |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X98311255 |
| Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98311255 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | © 1998 Cambridge University Press |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/124469 |
Downloads since deposit
163Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
