Chater, N;
(2002)
Is LF really a linguistic level?
BEHAV BRAIN SCI
, 25
(6)
680 - 680.
10.1017/S0140525X02280127.
Preview |
PDF
download8.pdf Download (43kB) |
Abstract
Carruthers's argument depends on viewing logical form as a linguistic level. But logical form is typically viewed as underpinning general purpose inference, and hence as having no particular connection to language processing. If logical form is tied directly to language, two problems arise: a logical problem concerning language acquisition and the empirical problem that aphasics appear capable of cross-modular reasoning.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Is LF really a linguistic level? |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X02280127 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02280127 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © 2002 Cambridge University Press |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/124413 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |