UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The Inside Out of Journal Editing and Peer Review: A Collective Reflection on Review of Education’s Mentoring Scheme for Early Career Researchers

Chong, Sin-Wang; Bergdahl, Nina; Bond, Melissa; Wong, Amy; Cen, Jiayi; Givans, Nysha; Godfrey, Caroline; ... Zhang, Shishi; + view all (2025) The Inside Out of Journal Editing and Peer Review: A Collective Reflection on Review of Education’s Mentoring Scheme for Early Career Researchers. Review of Education , 13 (3) , Article e70121. 10.1002/rev3.70121. Green open access

[thumbnail of Review of Education - 2025 - Chong - The inside out of journal editing and peer review  A collective reflection on the.pdf]
Preview
Text
Review of Education - 2025 - Chong - The inside out of journal editing and peer review A collective reflection on the.pdf - Published Version

Download (326kB) | Preview

Abstract

Academic journals have an ethical obligation to equip and support the next generation of researchers to be active members of academia, including in journal peer review. Although the peer review system is regarded by some as ‘broken’, peer review remains a crucial mechanism for gatekeeping and researcher development. As a group of established and emerging educational researchers, we have benefited from constructive feedback and criticisms from journal editors and peer reviewers. At the same time, we acknowledge that peer review has been one of the sources of frustration for many researchers due to delays, unfavourable outcomes and unhelpful feedback. In this piece, we reflect collectively on our recent experience leading and participating in a mentoring scheme on journal editing and peer review for early career researchers. Our reflections shed light on some hidden aspects of journal editing and peer review, including constraints and challenges faced by editors and peer reviewers. In addition to emphasising the need to empower early career researchers to participate fully in journal peer review through intentional, hands‐on and sustained support, we advocate for a compassion‐based approach to journal editing and peer review that values empathy, mutual respect and a focus on researchers' emotional well‐being.

Type: Article
Title: The Inside Out of Journal Editing and Peer Review: A Collective Reflection on Review of Education’s Mentoring Scheme for Early Career Researchers
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/rev3.70121
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70121
Language: English
Additional information: © 2025 The Author(s). Review of Education published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Early career researchers, journal editing, journal peer review, researcher development
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Culture, Communication and Media
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10217516
Downloads since deposit
4Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item