UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Sufficiency of current practice: How well does the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire detect clinically elevated posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms in children in care?

Sprecher, Eva A; Shelton, Katherine; Holmes, Lisa; Carter, Bethan; Robinson, Charlotte; Javed, Maryam; Khan, Ruby; ... Hiller, Rachel M; + view all (2025) Sufficiency of current practice: How well does the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire detect clinically elevated posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms in children in care? JCPP Advances , Article e70058. 10.1002/jcv2.70058. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of JCPP Advances - 2025 - Sprecher - Sufficiency of current practice How well does the Strengths and Difficulties.pdf]
Preview
Text
JCPP Advances - 2025 - Sprecher - Sufficiency of current practice How well does the Strengths and Difficulties.pdf - Published Version

Download (278kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: It is well-established that children living in care are at far greater risk of mental health difficulties than their peers. This includes common and trauma-specific mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In England, the mental health of children in care is monitored using the caregiver-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Our aim was to understand the sufficiency of current screening practices for children in care. We investigated how sensitive the SDQ was to clinically elevated PTSD, anxiety, and depression symptoms. // Methods: The sample included 491 children aged 10–18 years old, under local authority care, and their caregiver where available (n = 342 carers, including foster carers, kinship carers and residential keyworkers). Children and caregivers completed the SDQ, and children also completed standardised measures of anxiety and depression and PTSD symptom, using established cut-offs for clinically elevated symptoms. // Results: Most of the sample scored above clinical threshold on at least one measure. Caregiver-reported SDQ scores were weakly correlated with child self-reported PTSD, anxiety, and depression scores, while self-reported SDQ scores were moderately correlated with their self-report on the other symptom scales. A large proportion of children scoring in the clinical range on the anxiety (44%), depression (46%), or PTSD (48%) symptoms measures did not score in the carer-report SDQ clinical range. Similar patterns were found using the self-report SDQ, with somewhat higher detection rates found when combining self- and carer-report SDQ. // Conclusion: Relying only on the carer-report SDQ as a mental health screening tool is likely inadequate to detect mental health symptomology in children in care. Whilst this was never the purpose of the SDQ, it is how it is commonly used in practice. We discuss the benefits of including children's voices and disorder-specific screening tools (e.g., for PTSD) into mental health assessments for children living in care.

Type: Article
Title: Sufficiency of current practice: How well does the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire detect clinically elevated posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms in children in care?
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.70058
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70058
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). JCPP Advances published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Anxiety, children in care, depression, mental health assessment, PTSD, screening questionnaires
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10216970
Downloads since deposit
18Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item