UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Constraints on syntactic adaptation from a failure to generalise to the subject-object ambiguity

Kuz, Varvara; Guo, Buhan; Liu, Ya; Zhang, Conghao; Zhang, Yuqian; Santi, Andrea; (2025) Constraints on syntactic adaptation from a failure to generalise to the subject-object ambiguity. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience , 40 (6) pp. 868-887. 10.1080/23273798.2025.2479706. Green open access

[thumbnail of Santi_Constraints on syntactic adaptation from a failure to generalise to the subject-object ambiguity_VoR.pdf]
Preview
Text
Santi_Constraints on syntactic adaptation from a failure to generalise to the subject-object ambiguity_VoR.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Adaptation to garden path processing has been observed when processing immediately follows a nonsyntactic conflict (Stroop) trial, demonstrating domain-general conflict adaptation. Likewise, adaptation to garden path processing has been observed progressively over an experiment with incremental exposure. Two high-powered experiments tested generalisability of both forms of adaptation to the subject/object garden path within the same dataset. Each trial included a Stroop task followed by self-paced sentence reading. Experiment 1 had 50% co-occurrence between a subordinate-first clause and early closure, which then increased to 100% in Experiment 2, making the subordinate clause a reliable cue. While Stroop and ambiguity effects were observed, neither adaptation effects were. Trial-level conflict adaptation may be constrained to particular paradigms (e.g. visual world) or across conflicts of the same representational format (e.g. syntactic-to-syntactic conflicts). Absence of experiment-level adaptation suggests constraints on changes to our expectations for late closure and/or a less probable but frequent parse.

Type: Article
Title: Constraints on syntactic adaptation from a failure to generalise to the subject-object ambiguity
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2025.2479706
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2025.2479706
Language: English
Additional information: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Syntactic adaptation, syntactic cues, expectations, implicit learning, garden-path effect, sentence processing
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Linguistics
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10216811
Downloads since deposit
3Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item