Stoeckl, Natalie;
Costanza, Robert;
Dorji, Namgay;
Kubiszewski, Ida;
Limenih, Bassie;
Tian, Jing;
Yamazaki, Satoshi;
(2025)
Valuing the reciprocating services that humans can provide to ecosystems.
Ecological Indicators
, 174
, Article 113496. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113496.
Preview |
Text
Stoeclk et al. Reciprocating Services 2025.pdf - Published Version Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Long-term sustainability requires that humans consider not only what ecosystems can do for them, but also how humans can ‘give back’ or reciprocate. Indigenous Australians call this ‘caring for country’. Industrial societies have routinely undervalued both the ecosystem services (ES) that nature provides to humans and the reciprocating services (RS) that humans provide to ecosystems. The policy challenge is to find ways of encouraging more RS in industrial societies. The practice of monetarily valuing ES helps highlight their importance and has brought the environment to the forefront of many international policy discussions. We argue that sustainability could be further enhanced by better valuing RS. First, the simple acknowledgement and celebration of RS (without monetary valuation) could change institutions, social norms, and behaviours. Second, numerous institutions now provide financial incentives for people to undertake nature-positive projects (a type of RS), but nature-positive investments are hampered by information failures. Comprehensive assessments of the expected value of proposed projects, could fill information gaps and guide investments towards projects that are likely to generate the most benefit. But these are difficult to do well. We discuss some of the particular difficulties of generating meaningful value estimates for RS that generate diverse benefits at large scale, or that create change in highly connected systems. We note the need for more transdisciplinary research to further improve methods; arguing that if we only do what we are currently good at (valuing discrete benefits at small scale and using crude approaches to scale upwards) then we will continue to overlook, undervalue and under resource many of the critically important RS that support us all.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Valuing the reciprocating services that humans can provide to ecosystems |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113496 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113496 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
| Keywords: | Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Biodiversity Conservation, Environmental Sciences, Biodiversity & Conservation, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Ecosystem services, Non-market valuation, Nature positive plan, Carbon markets, Biodiversity markets, Environmental economic accounting, Expected value of restoration, NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS, BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS, BENEFIT TRANSFER, SOCIAL VALUES, FRAMEWORK, VALUATION, PREFERENCES, UNCERTAINTY, MANAGEMENT, WORK |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > UCL Institute for Global Prosperity |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10213160 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
